Welcome, God and All...
And the three men I admire most
- The Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost -
They caught the last train for the coast
The day...the music...died.
{Don McLean, "American Pie", 1972)
Somewhere back around three months ago, I was writing a trilogy over my summer of surprises. Since then, the local water project has been completed and our street returned to whatever normal is supposed to be these days. It's now November, the national election is at its climax, and the US of A is caught between mourning the passing of All Hallows (Hallowe'en) and the anticipation of HanYulFestiMaZaa (an amalgamation of Hanukkah, Yule [the winter solstice], Festivus, Christmas, and Kwanzaa). I suspect that the nation is not in the holiday mood this year because the presidential election hasn't been decided. I know this is perhaps premature - but I don't think so, because as close as this race is, as divided a nation as we appear, it will likely be weeks - and several accusations and court decisions, and potential violence in the streets - before we know who will sit in the Oval Office for the next four years. That's why the countdown to December 25 seems to have started even earlier this year than last. Radio stations began playing music for the holiday season in earnest on November 1, perhaps to take some edge off of the election jitters. And for a couple of hours, I thought it was working. Oh, I'll get into it soon enough, because of what started this whole thing a couple of thousand years ago. This year, though, has the potential of being about as bittersweet as my first Christmas season without my beloved Diane ten years ago.
In the third part of the trilogy, I wrote of a twist in the story of my relationship with God, Christ, and His Holy Church. I learned that one of the now several parishes in which I serve, and possibly for the longest time (roughly 25 years), was on a list of 19 parishes in the Catholic Diocese of Joliet being considered for what they call "targeted restructuring."
What's this like, you may ask?
In a business sense, this takes on different scenarios. A business entity may have two factories manufacturing similar products. Demand for said products has dropped to the point where operating both factories is cost prohibitive, so the decision is made to close one factory and merge its operations into the other. Another decision could be to drastically reduce production (and thus, employment at one factory but keep it open on a limited basis with reduced staff until business conditions favor a re-opening, sometimes with the addition of a reconfiguration of the facility to handle a new or different product line.
Essentially, this is happening in the Joliet Diocese. There is a lack of demand for as many Catholic parishes as currently exist. Shifting population, the general trend of a lack of interest in ascribing to a religious affiliation (which wasn't helped by churches being deemed "non-essential" during the COVID-19 pandemic); the shutdown during the pandemic itself, the state of the economy and the world stage; even the scandals affecting the priesthood and the dwindling number of priests able to serve as pastors have all had a hand in reducing, as it were, supply and demand in and of the Church, particularly in the United States. Scandal among the priesthood in Joliet attracted LOTS of attention - and lots of lawsuits - and lots of cash settlements that are still being paid out.
The current bishop of the diocese has sought to reduce costs and their footprint. The first of these steps or phases was to reduce diocesan staff by ten percent; and to remove a number of positions from full-time to part-time status. The latter was done to reduce the requirement to provide medical insurance benefits as current US law does not require employers to offer these benefits to part-time staff. Some positions were combined into others to reduce staff.
The second phase was a restructuring of the parishes within the immediate Joliet region (or deanery). After restructuring the number of parishes was reduced from sixteen to eight, with five parishes actually closing, or under the official term, being "extinguished." The original plan was actually going to reduce the number to seven, but a parish built long before the diocese was established in 1948 claimed to have conditions the diocese did not take into account. That parish went over the bishop's head and petitioned the Vatican to have the decision overturned - and their petition was successful. The diocese has chosen not to appeal this overturn. That process began in 2023 and the restructuring took effect in July 2024.
Upon completion of the second phase, the third and current phase was launched. This time, nineteen parishes were tagged in the more populated area of the diocese in the western suburbs of Chicago. I serve in one of those nineteen parishes and have done so for twenty-five years.
One of the earliest reactions to being put on this hit list was one of disbelief. It can't be us. It won't be us. We have a newer campus on a through street with easy access, our facilities are compliant for the disabled, and our location attracts Mass-goers and worshipers from the busy shopping district and office complexes nearby. So much so, that we offer daily Mass at midday rather that early morning to serve this niche.
However, offsetting this is the fact that none of these office and store workers actually live in or are registered in that parish. When the location was considered over fifty years ago, it was likely thought that there would be more family residential homes within its boundaries. Unfortunately, development turned into more offices and stores, and what residential homes have been added over the years are retirement communities instead of single-family homes.
The diocesan committee overseeing the restructuring process started to gather its data. What it looked at was financial resources on hand, offset by any potential outstanding debt; age and condition of the facilities; as well as the record of baptisms and marriages performed annually, and the historical average Mass attendance on weekends. I don't dispute that this information is necessary; it just isn't enough.
In our case, each of the three priests assigned prior to the current pastor reached retirement age during their terms as pastor, and our current pastor is only two years away from retirement himself. In Elgin I had worked with a priest who had been reassigned close to his retirement age and was unhappy about it as the parish he was coming from was newer and he had hoped to retire from there. And it's reasonable to suggest that as priests get closer to their retirement age, that they're looking forward to getting out of administration and to simply work in the background as their health and situation permits. It's also reasonable that they might take a minimal position as possible on growing the community, especially in a community which might be aging as fast as the retiring priest. This is certainly a contributing factor, and it is an important one. Keeping a church open if there's no full-time and capable priest to pastor it contributes to burnout of the priests who are called upon to pastor multiple parishes, not even necessarily in close proximity to each other.
Another thing the committee does not seem to have considered is what relationship exists within the present structure of the community. Granted it might appear that we don't do much, but the work we do IS essential. I hope that was made clear during the pandemic. As this particular congregation is more senior, attention can be focused there. But we also consider ongoing faith formation, and that's important because we all need refresher courses in that, and it's not something one can get in fifteen minutes on a Sunday morning. There's no lack of interest, but the numbers are noticeably small. Is it now time for Catholicism in the USA to abandon its neighborhoods and move further into the big box, warehouse look and feel the evangelicals use?
The committee was aware that any suggestion to close a particular church would be met with some opposition, but their reaction to this was not one of sympathy or looking to review and reflect on what information they have or pick up on a solution they had not previously considered. No, their response was a vague acknowledgement that we will be inconvenienced by having to travel another fifteen minutes in suburban traffic to a church building that may not have the ease of access to the disabled. Not to mention that some will feel so 'inconvenienced' that they will choose to effectively leave the Church.
Then there's the fate of those working in the affected parishes. If you're closing a building and moving its assets to another, you don't need two full sets of staff to operate it, so it is very difficult for the displaced staff who must suddenly look for new work - elsewhere. And the thorn in this is that while the restructuring decision will be announced in January, the priests who will serve as pastors in the newly restructured and open parishes may not be announced before May - leaving everyone affected in both places wondering how or if they fit in this 'new' place. That's where I find myself right now. As a musician, one of many and probably sufficient quantity in the surviving facility, there may not be a place for me - especially since at present I make a nearly forty-mile round trip in that suburban traffic every time I serve there, which to now I have been generally happy to do. I love my colleagues and have affection for the community I serve. They have been good to me over all these years, and I will miss them.
What pains me most is that THIS IS THE HOUSE OF GOD AND THE PEOPLE OF GOD I'M TALKING ABOUT! And while we must be prudent and good stewards of our resources, both financial and human, all the conversation has tap-danced around this important difference between a commercial entity and the Church!
People are undeniably upset about this. Some have lost sleep, a few others have wept over the prospect of knowing their house of worship is likely to close (of the scenarios presented by the committee, our chance of surviving closure is only 25%). And many trying to read between the lines and the body language and tone of the committee's spokesperson, sense that the final decision has already been made and is not being announced until after Christmas so as not to lose the large collection usually taken in at the celebration of Jesus' birth, or to mar our would-be festive mood. Sadly, it looks as if in trying to ward off collateral damage, the damage is already done.
Finally, in seeking to figure out where I will land going forward, I must reexamine my place as an 'inactive' deacon. Is there anything at all to be gained by attempting to learn what I would have to do in order to restore my full faculties? Or does it remain a cross I am burdened to bear? And what might God have to say to weigh in on what decision I make?
As I get closer to ending my 70th turn on the merry-go-round that is life, I wonder if I am getting too old for all this drama. Then I remember that for about half of the last ten years my son and I lived in virtual isolation, and while it was no Hell, it may have felt a bit like Purgatory. So, I have to apologize to the reader and ask forgiveness for the presumptuous title of this essay. The music itself will not die. It will continue to live, and I will have opportunities to share in that ministry. I took on leadership in another program, not affected by the potential closure; that in itself keeps me busy. And if God is challenging me to make some sort of comeback, I need to give that serious thought and discussion. That said, I fully intend to hang on to the end of one chapter before jumping to the next. I know that there will be others, knowing that the ship is sinking, will bail out at the first opportunity; I can't see doing that unless that's what God demands. I must experience this sense of loss to be able to fully appreciate whatever will come after it.
Until we meet again, may God be with you...and may God have mercy on us all...
+the Phoenix